Members of Singapore’s literary and publishing community are ringing alarms over the National Library Board’s (NLB) approach to generative artificial intelligence (AI). On 7 January 2024, a collective statement was released, voicing concerns that an uncritical endorsement of this technology could ‘permanently damage Singapore’s literary landscape.’
Collective Concerns
The statement was initially signed by 68 prominent figures, including Cultural Medallion recipient Haresh Sharma and International Booker Prize-longlisted translator Jeremy Tiang. Organiser Ng Yi-Sheng noted that the number of signatories grew to 82 by 8 January.
Key issues highlighted in the statement include:
- Concerns about the impact on traditional writing skills.
- Intellectual property rights and the ethical implications of AI-generated content.
- The potential negative effects on the quality of literature.
- Environmental repercussions associated with AI technology.
Programs Under Scrutiny
A significant point of contention is NLB’s recent initiative, StoryGen, developed in collaboration with Amazon Web Services. This generative AI application aims to allow users to reimagine local folktales, yet the literary community fears it may encourage views that AI can replace traditional writing development.
The statement urges the NLB to reconsider its current policy and remove programs that suggest generative AI could serve as an adequate alternative to conventional writing practices. They believe NLB’s promotion of AI tools should come with a responsibility to educate the public on their limitations.
Seeking Dialogue
Addressed to NLB’s leadership, including Chairman Lee Seow Hiang and Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo, the statement calls for a consultation with literary professionals. ‘We trust you will remember this valuable role you play in our society,’ it states, advocating for policies that enhance, rather than diminish, the richness of Singapore’s literary culture.
As they navigate these complex issues, the authors of the statement remind us—the implications of AI reach far beyond mere technology and touch the very fabric of creative expression.