The Singapore government has taken a firm stance against the New York Times (NYT) regarding misleading statements made in an opinion video featuring Li Shengwu, a Harvard professor and nephew of former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. In a letter dated 26 January 2024, Singapore’s Ambassador to the US, Lui Tuck Yew, emphasised the importance of accurately representing the nation’s political landscape.
Misleading Comparisons
In the NYT video, titled How Tyranny Begins, Li claimed that Singapore employs tactics similar to those used by oppressive regimes in Russia, Hungary, and Nicaragua. However, Lui refuted these assertions, stating that Li has neither been exiled nor deprived of his assets.
- Li remains a Singapore citizen, able to return anytime.
- He was fined S$15,000 for contempt of court in 2020.
- Lui invited Li to contest in the upcoming General Election, which must occur by November 2024.
Allegations Against the Government
Li accused his uncle of using police investigations and criminal prosecutions to silence dissenters. He cited his past experiences following a critical Facebook post in 2017. Responding to Li’s claims, Ambassador Lui reiterated that no one is above the law in Singapore, emphasising the nation’s commitment to legal integrity.
Defending Singapore’s Reputation
Highlighting Singapore’s robust legal framework, Lui stated, “Contrary to the dark picture that you and Mr Li paint, the Singapore that Mr Lee Kuan Yew built ranks 16th on the 2024 Rule of Law Index, well ahead of the US for many years.” He added that the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index ranked Singapore the 5th least corrupt globally.
Family Feuds and Political Dynamics
Li’s father, Lee Hsien Yang, and his wife have been involved in a prolonged legal dispute surrounding the family estate at 38 Oxley Road. The couple’s criticisms of the government were described as attempts to distract from their legal troubles, according to the ambassador.
A Call for Honest Discourse
In parting, Ambassador Lui expressed disappointment that Li has chosen to undermine Singapore’s image while wielding the legacy of his grandfather. He stated, “It is deeply regrettable that Li has chosen to denigrate the very country his grandfather had a pivotal role building.” Such comments highlight the complexities surrounding political discourse and familial relations within Singapore.