Philippines Challenges China’s Coast Guard Activity in South China Sea

The ongoing tension between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea has escalated as Manila actively challenges Beijing’s aggressive maritime activities. Recent incidents highlight the urge from Philippine officials to protect their fishermen and territorial integrity.

Philippine Protests Against Chinese Presence

On 14 January 2024, the Philippines accused China of intimidating local fishermen by deploying its largest coast guard vessel, known as the “monster ship”, within Manila’s 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ). According to Jonathan Malaya from the National Security Council, this ship was seen as a tactic to intimidate Filipino fishermen near Scarborough Shoal.

  • Vessel identified: 165 m long ship 5901 spotted 143 km off Zambales.
  • Malaya described the ship’s presence as “illegal” and “unacceptable”.
  • Chinese actions seen as a means to destabilise existing agreements.

Coast Guard Confrontations

Similarly, on 12 January 2024, the Philippine Coast Guard dispatched a ship to challenge Chinese patrol boats, which are claimed to have come alarmingly close to the main island of Luzon—specifically, just 60 nautical miles away. Commodore Jay Tarriela asserted these patrols aim to alter the existing status quo in the region.

With Philippine vessels increasingly facing off against Chinese maritime patrols, there’s rising concern about potential military conflicts drawing in the United States, a longstanding ally of Manila.

International Context

The South China Sea remains a flashpoint due to overlapping territorial claims by several nations, including Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Following a 2016 ruling by an international tribunal that denied the legitimacy of China’s expansive claims, the adherence to maritime law has been a hotly contested issue.

Chinese officials have reiterated their stance, claiming their actions in the disputed waters are justified and lawful. However, the Philippines maintains its right to ensure the safety of its fishermen and sovereignty over its territorial waters.

The situation remains fluid, with both sides remaining firm on their positions while international attention closely monitors developments in this vital shipping area.